GHSA-576C-C7PP-5JG8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:54 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:54
VLAI
Details
Amberdms Billing System (ABS) before 1.4.1 does not properly implement blacklisting after detection of invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-5291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-10T16:47:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Amberdms Billing System (ABS) before 1.4.1 does not properly implement blacklisting after detection of invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a brute-force approach.",
"id": "GHSA-576c-c7pp-5jg8",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:54:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:54:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-5291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://projects.jethrocarr.com/p/oss-amberdms-bs/source/tree/f23f1121bd137bf798c8d3f01d35fa297a285331/help/docs/RELEASE_NOTES"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.github.com/jethrocarr/amberdms-bs/master/help/docs/CHANGELOG"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…