GHSA-55QC-4WG3-F2P8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:28 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:28
VLAI
Details

Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as installing new modules or changing a password.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-14025"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-09-22T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Ozeki NG SMS Gateway through 4.17.6 has multiple CSRF vulnerabilities. For example, an administrator, by following a link, can be tricked into making unwanted changes such as installing new modules or changing a password.",
  "id": "GHSA-55qc-4wg3-f2p8",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:28:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:28:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14025"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/DrunkenShells/Disclosures/tree/master/CVE-2020-14025-Cross-Site%20Request%20Forgery-Ozeki%20SMS%20Gateway"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ozeki.hu/index.php?owpn=231"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…