GHSA-555R-F9M4-VP82
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-22 21:31 – Updated: 2025-10-22 21:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel/lbr: Fix unchecked MSR access error on HSW
The fuzzer triggers the below trace.
[ 7763.384369] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x689 (tried to write 0x1fffffff8101349e) at rIP: 0xffffffff810704a4 (native_write_msr+0x4/0x20) [ 7763.397420] Call Trace: [ 7763.399881] [ 7763.401994] intel_pmu_lbr_restore+0x9a/0x1f0 [ 7763.406363] intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task+0x91/0x1c0 [ 7763.410992] __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x1cd/0x240
On a machine with the LBR format LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2, when the TSX is disabled, a TSX quirk is required to access LBR from registers. The lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is introduced to determine whether the TSX quirk should be applied. However, the lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is invoked before the intel_pmu_lbr_init(), which parses the LBR format information. Without the correct LBR format information, the TSX quirk never be applied.
Move the lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() into the intel_pmu_lbr_init(). Checking x86_pmu.lbr_has_tsx in the lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is not required anymore.
Both LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2 and LBR_FORMAT_INFO have LBR_TSX flag, but only the LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2 requirs the quirk. Update the comments accordingly.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-49565"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:32Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/x86/intel/lbr: Fix unchecked MSR access error on HSW\n\nThe fuzzer triggers the below trace.\n\n[ 7763.384369] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x689\n(tried to write 0x1fffffff8101349e) at rIP: 0xffffffff810704a4\n(native_write_msr+0x4/0x20)\n[ 7763.397420] Call Trace:\n[ 7763.399881] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 7763.401994] intel_pmu_lbr_restore+0x9a/0x1f0\n[ 7763.406363] intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task+0x91/0x1c0\n[ 7763.410992] __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x1cd/0x240\n\nOn a machine with the LBR format LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2, when the TSX is\ndisabled, a TSX quirk is required to access LBR from registers.\nThe lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is introduced to determine whether\nthe TSX quirk should be applied. However, the\nlbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is invoked before the\nintel_pmu_lbr_init(), which parses the LBR format information. Without\nthe correct LBR format information, the TSX quirk never be applied.\n\nMove the lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() into the intel_pmu_lbr_init().\nChecking x86_pmu.lbr_has_tsx in the lbr_from_signext_quirk_needed() is\nnot required anymore.\n\nBoth LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2 and LBR_FORMAT_INFO have LBR_TSX flag, but\nonly the LBR_FORMAT_EIP_FLAGS2 requirs the quirk. Update the comments\naccordingly.",
"id": "GHSA-555r-f9m4-vp82",
"modified": "2025-10-22T21:31:16Z",
"published": "2025-10-22T21:31:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49565"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/625bcd0685a1612225df83468c83412fc0edb3d7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0380e13502adf7dd8be4c47d622c3522aae6c63"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.