GHSA-4XMG-FQ3W-FH32

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:22 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:22
VLAI
Details

Macromedia Flash Communication Server MX 1.0 and 1.5 does not sufficiently validate certain RTMP data, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (instability or crash), as demonstrated using an alpha release build of Flash Player 8.5 (build 133).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-3901"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-11-29T22:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Macromedia Flash Communication Server MX 1.0 and 1.5 does not sufficiently validate certain RTMP data, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (instability or crash), as demonstrated using an alpha release build of Flash Player 8.5 (build 133).",
  "id": "GHSA-4xmg-fq3w-fh32",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:22:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:22:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3901"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17612"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015219"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/security/security_zone/mpsb05-09.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/20869"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15437"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…