GHSA-4X72-5G49-GXPH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:06 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:06
VLAI
Details
Buffer overflow in Bluetooth FTP client (BTFTP) in Nokia Affix 2.1.2 and 3.2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in an OBEX file share.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2250"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-07-13T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in Bluetooth FTP client (BTFTP) in Nokia Affix 2.1.2 and 3.2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in an OBEX file share.",
"id": "GHSA-4x72-5g49-gxph",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:06:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:06:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2250"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://affix.sourceforge.net/affix_212_sec.patch"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.digitalmunition.com/DMA%5B2005-0712a%5D.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14230"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…