GHSA-4WGJ-9QHP-2583

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: xt_nat: reject unsupported target families

xt_nat SNAT and DNAT target handlers assume IP-family conntrack state is present and can dereference a NULL pointer when instantiated from an unsupported family through nft_compat. A bridge-family compat rule can therefore trigger a NULL-dereference in nf_nat_setup_info().

Reject non-IP families in xt_nat_checkentry() so unsupported targets cannot be installed. Keep NFPROTO_INET allowed for valid inet NAT compat users and leave the runtime fast path unchanged.

[ The crash was fixed via 9dbba7e694ec ("netfilter: nft_compat: ebtables emulation must reject non-bridge targets"), so this patch is no longer critical. Nevertheless, NAT is only relevant for ipv4/ipv6, so this extra family check is a good idea in any case. ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80664"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: xt_nat: reject unsupported target families\n\nxt_nat SNAT and DNAT target handlers assume IP-family conntrack state\nis present and can dereference a NULL pointer when instantiated from an\nunsupported family through nft_compat. A bridge-family compat rule can\ntherefore trigger a NULL-dereference in nf_nat_setup_info().\n\nReject non-IP families in xt_nat_checkentry() so unsupported targets\ncannot be installed. Keep NFPROTO_INET allowed for valid inet NAT\ncompat users and leave the runtime fast path unchanged.\n\n[ The crash was fixed via\n  9dbba7e694ec (\"netfilter: nft_compat: ebtables emulation must reject non-bridge targets\"),\n  so this patch is no longer critical.\n  Nevertheless, NAT is only relevant for ipv4/ipv6, so this extra\n  family check is a good idea in any case. ]",
  "id": "GHSA-4wgj-9qhp-2583",
  "modified": "2026-08-29T09:30:27Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T09:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80664"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0afc9ad987c0faa80ab5f8d6e7815085ac8dbb82"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49abe564391411057a26a9a943c8e17867c3b9b4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4fbc2bac02edabb665beb2aa87ca6f1e1d4c4777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d1a2240935ea47e2673d0ea17fdb058e4dc91dd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/679ced28a9dc2f6dc679eb05027d779693e60902"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a842dab87cab29f2a5798a47b2dc5e6a449950bf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e35c048d7511e9d4c2a537b8a231c49606e97c16"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec88fa71c82072e9189983b05b499d3507550271"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…