GHSA-4W99-5J2P-3CWF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:05 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:15
VLAI?
Details
Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 before URP1 for Windows 2000 SP4 does not properly prevent NULL sessions from accessing certain alternate named pipes, which allows remote attackers to (1) list Windows services via svcctl or (2) read eventlogs via eventlog.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2150"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-07-11T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 before URP1 for Windows 2000 SP4 does not properly prevent NULL sessions from accessing certain alternate named pipes, which allows remote attackers to (1) list Windows services via svcctl or (2) read eventlogs via eventlog.",
"id": "GHSA-4w99-5j2p-3cwf",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:15:02Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:05:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2150"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/21286"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/21288"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112076409813099\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14189"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014417"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/presentations/null_sessions"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14177"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14178"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…