GHSA-4W7W-2MRJ-36VW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-25 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

locking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued

syzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:

KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f] class_raw_spinlock_constructor remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561 rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120 futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0 __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0

task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection, leaving waiter->task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()") made this fatal.

Furthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter() upon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 ("futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() (where 'ret' was only ever 0 or < 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to account for try_to_take_rt_mutex().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53163"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:33Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlocking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued\n\nsyzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via\nFUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:\n\n  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f]\n   class_raw_spinlock_constructor\n   remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561\n   rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120\n   futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0\n   __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0\n\ntask_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection,\nleaving waiter-\u003etask nil, where 3bfdc63936dd (\"rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead\nof current in remove_waiter()\") made this fatal.\n\nFurthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter()\nupon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 (\"futex: Handle early deadlock\nreturn correctly\"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()\n(where \u0027ret\u0027 was only ever 0 or \u003c 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to\naccount for try_to_take_rt_mutex().",
  "id": "GHSA-4w7w-2mrj-36vw",
  "modified": "2026-06-25T09:31:19Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:19Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53163"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40a25d59e85b3c8709ac2424d44f65610467871e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55363fa0a04524d11efeaadee734d2db1756ed27"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a388e3dfaf9538a680de5ed43a8ebb5dd45b6e53"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…