GHSA-4W38-QPR9-G5QM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:59 – Updated: 2022-05-24 16:59
VLAI
Details
An issue was discovered on Fujitsu Wireless Keyboard Set LX390 GK381 devices. Because of the lack of proper encryption of 2.4 GHz communication, and because of password-based authentication, they are vulnerable to replay attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-18199"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-294"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-24T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered on Fujitsu Wireless Keyboard Set LX390 GK381 devices. Because of the lack of proper encryption of 2.4 GHz communication, and because of password-based authentication, they are vulnerable to replay attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-4w38-qpr9-g5qm",
"modified": "2022-05-24T16:59:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:59:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18199"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-009.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.syss.de/pentest-blog/2019/syss-2019-009-syss-2019-010-und-syss-2019-011-schwachstellen-in-weiterer-funktastatur-mit-sicherer-24-ghz-technologie"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154954/Fujitsu-Wireless-Keyboard-Set-LX390-Replay-Attacks.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…