GHSA-4RQQ-8R2Q-F5PJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:23 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:23
VLAI
Details
The IMAP task in the server in IBM Lotus Domino 8.0.2 before FP1 IF1 and 8.5 before IF3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a MIME e-mail message with RFC822 attachments (aka blobs) containing malformed root entities.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1286"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-04-13T16:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The IMAP task in the server in IBM Lotus Domino 8.0.2 before FP1 IF1 and 8.5 before IF3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a MIME e-mail message with RFC822 attachments (aka blobs) containing malformed root entities.",
"id": "GHSA-4rqq-8r2q-f5pj",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:23:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:23:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1286"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/34657"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1022024"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21379894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21379915"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21381562"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21381566"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34441"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0986"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…