GHSA-4R3V-6FHP-P4MW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:10
VLAI
Details
The Marmoset Viewer WordPress plugin before 1.9.3 does not property sanitize, validate or escape the 'id' parameter before outputting back in the page, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24495"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-08-09T10:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Marmoset Viewer WordPress plugin before 1.9.3 does not property sanitize, validate or escape the \u0027id\u0027 parameter before outputting back in the page, leading to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue.",
"id": "GHSA-4r3v-6fhp-p4mw",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:10:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:10:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24495"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://johnjhacking.com/blog/cve-2021-24495-improper-neutralization-of-input-during-web-page-generation-on-id-parameter-in-wordpress-marmoset-viewer-plugin-versions-1.9.3-leads-to-reflected-cross-site-scripting"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/d11b79a3-f762-49ab-b7c8-3174624d7638"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…