GHSA-4QHH-MF87-XRFM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-23 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
namespace: queue a mount only once for mount notifications
mnt_notify_add() puts a mount on notify_list. It doesn't check whether the mount is on the list already. That's fine as long as every mount is queued at most once per namespace_sem hold. It isn't.
propagate_umount() moves a surviving overmount off a stack of mounts that are going away and queues it as moved. shrink_submounts() and mark_mounts_for_expiry() call umount_tree() for several mounts under a single namespace_sem hold. So the second umount_tree() can take down exactly the mount the first one reparented, reparent it once more and so end up queueing it a second time.
The second list_add_tail() cuts the mounts queued in between out of the list while the head still points at the last of them. notify_mnt_list() then only visits that one mount and the others are freed after the grace period with notify_list still pointing at them. Every later mount operation on the host walks freed memory:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __list_add_valid_or_report Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881003d57e0 by task notify_dq/162 __list_add_valid_or_report+0x15c/0x1a0 mnt_add_to_ns+0x322/0x890 attach_recursive_mnt.isra.0+0xf2a/0x1a00 path_mount+0x139c/0x1d40
This needs a mount with MNT_SHRINKABLE to bind from. That's what finish_automount() creates (submounts of NFS, AFS and CIFS and the tracefs mount below debugfs). Bind mounts inherit the flag. A mount namespace with a FAN_MARK_MNTNS mark does the rest and root in a user namespace can have both.
Initialize to_notify in alloc_vfsmnt() and leave a mount alone that is queued already. mnt_notify() looks at the state the mount has when the list is drained so a single entry per mount is enough. The move event for a mount that is unmounted under the same hold is lost. That's fine. The detach is what matters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98991"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T13:17:21Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnamespace: queue a mount only once for mount notifications\n\nmnt_notify_add() puts a mount on notify_list. It doesn\u0027t check whether\nthe mount is on the list already. That\u0027s fine as long as every mount is\nqueued at most once per namespace_sem hold. It isn\u0027t.\n\npropagate_umount() moves a surviving overmount off a stack of mounts\nthat are going away and queues it as moved. shrink_submounts() and\nmark_mounts_for_expiry() call umount_tree() for several mounts under a\nsingle namespace_sem hold. So the second umount_tree() can take down\nexactly the mount the first one reparented, reparent it once more and so\nend up queueing it a second time.\n\nThe second list_add_tail() cuts the mounts queued in between out of the\nlist while the head still points at the last of them. notify_mnt_list()\nthen only visits that one mount and the others are freed after the grace\nperiod with notify_list still pointing at them. Every later mount\noperation on the host walks freed memory:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __list_add_valid_or_report\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881003d57e0 by task notify_dq/162\n __list_add_valid_or_report+0x15c/0x1a0\n mnt_add_to_ns+0x322/0x890\n attach_recursive_mnt.isra.0+0xf2a/0x1a00\n path_mount+0x139c/0x1d40\n\nThis needs a mount with MNT_SHRINKABLE to bind from. That\u0027s what\nfinish_automount() creates (submounts of NFS, AFS and CIFS and the\ntracefs mount below debugfs). Bind mounts inherit the flag. A mount\nnamespace with a FAN_MARK_MNTNS mark does the rest and root in a user\nnamespace can have both.\n\nInitialize to_notify in alloc_vfsmnt() and leave a mount alone that is\nqueued already. mnt_notify() looks at the state the mount has when the\nlist is drained so a single entry per mount is enough. The move event\nfor a mount that is unmounted under the same hold is lost. That\u0027s fine.\nThe detach is what matters.",
"id": "GHSA-4qhh-mf87-xrfm",
"modified": "2026-10-23T15:31:34Z",
"published": "2026-10-23T15:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98991"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/702ff3fe499876e09c45558a05366d21a5bc41ab"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/acbe9e4418e2ef7bef1a12e62e0e7d6145a15190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd2feb7796b6585938a4241e7b7c4148a6f7b762"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.