GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4QHC-6R4V-5WMG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-15 06:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xprtrdma: Check frwr_wp_create() during connect

frwr_wp_create() creates the singleton Memory Region used to encode padding for Write chunks whose payload length is not XDR-aligned. Its failure paths return a negative errno and leave ep->re_write_pad_mr set to NULL.

rpcrdma_xprt_connect() currently ignores that return value. If frwr_wp_create() fails after the rest of the connection setup succeeds, xprt_rdma_connect_worker() treats the connection attempt as successful and sets XPRT_CONNECTED. A later NFS/RDMA read with a non-4-byte-aligned receive page length reaches rpcrdma_encode_write_list(), passes the NULL write-pad MR to encode_rdma_segment(), and dereferences it.

This is locally triggerable on an NFS/RDMA client after a connect or reconnect hits a local MR allocation, DMA-map, MR-map, or post-send failure; a remote peer alone cannot force the local MR setup failure.

Check the return value and fail the connect as -ENOTCONN, matching the adjacent setup failures. This keeps XPRT_CONNECTED clear and lets the normal reconnect path retry.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72467"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:20Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxprtrdma: Check frwr_wp_create() during connect\n\nfrwr_wp_create() creates the singleton Memory Region used to encode\npadding for Write chunks whose payload length is not XDR-aligned. Its\nfailure paths return a negative errno and leave ep-\u003ere_write_pad_mr set\nto NULL.\n\nrpcrdma_xprt_connect() currently ignores that return value. If\nfrwr_wp_create() fails after the rest of the connection setup succeeds,\nxprt_rdma_connect_worker() treats the connection attempt as successful\nand sets XPRT_CONNECTED. A later NFS/RDMA read with a non-4-byte-aligned\nreceive page length reaches rpcrdma_encode_write_list(), passes the NULL\nwrite-pad MR to encode_rdma_segment(), and dereferences it.\n\nThis is locally triggerable on an NFS/RDMA client after a connect or\nreconnect hits a local MR allocation, DMA-map, MR-map, or post-send\nfailure; a remote peer alone cannot force the local MR setup failure.\n\nCheck the return value and fail the connect as -ENOTCONN, matching the\nadjacent setup failures. This keeps XPRT_CONNECTED clear and lets the\nnormal reconnect path retry.",
  "id": "GHSA-4qhc-6r4v-5wmg",
  "modified": "2026-08-15T06:32:25Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72467"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f13fc7c7d2e0427517e63c739277a4cd338b0c5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b252fe1778b2cdd68283146455929801bc2abd7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b7be4f3feae322f1c2c40a3bdc99db93574a49e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7471e66373a4444a57ef2192f8c4081202c54f45"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd798b76a3481e392820c3ae86ed4592858c6b0f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef3b79edf14b6bfb0d21a26ccb0463f9cf82c6a9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…