GHSA-4Q3G-QMC4-FFXV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:07 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:07
VLAI
Details

Unspecified vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server before 6.0.2.11 has unknown impact and attack vectors because the "UserNameToken cache was improperly used."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-3232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-06-27T10:05:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server before 6.0.2.11 has unknown impact and attack vectors because the \"UserNameToken cache was improperly used.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-4q3g-qmc4-ffxv",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T07:07:07Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T07:07:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-3232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/20732"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=180\u0026uid=swg27006876"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2482"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…