GHSA-4PJ9-6H83-Q463

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:11 – Updated: 2023-08-16 21:31
VLAI
Details

Some Brother printers (such as the HL-L8360CDW v1.20) were affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability as the IPP service did not parse attribute names properly. This would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-13192"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-03-13T19:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Some Brother printers (such as the HL-L8360CDW v1.20) were affected by a heap buffer overflow vulnerability as the IPP service did not parse attribute names properly. This would allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device.",
  "id": "GHSA-4pj9-6h83-q463",
  "modified": "2023-08-16T21:31:01Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:11:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13192"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://global.brother"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.brother.com/g/b/faqend.aspx?c=us\u0026lang=en\u0026prod=group2\u0026faqid=faq00100670_000"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.nccgroup.trust/us/our-research/technical-advisory-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-brother-printers"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…