GHSA-4MX5-RQ8Q-8H9X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:34 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:34The flashsv_decode_frame function in libavcodec/flashsv.c in FFmpeg before 2.1 does not properly validate a certain height value, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds array access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted Flash Screen Video data.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7015"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-12-09T16:36:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The flashsv_decode_frame function in libavcodec/flashsv.c in FFmpeg before 2.1 does not properly validate a certain height value, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds array access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted Flash Screen Video data.",
"id": "GHSA-4mx5-rq8q-8h9x",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:34:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:34:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/880c73cd76109697447fbfbaa8e5ee5683309446"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/2844"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ffmpeg.org/security.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/11/26/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/12/08/3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2855"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.