GHSA-4MH8-7CRP-48X9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-07 18:31 – Updated: 2026-02-04 00:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: drop gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs
The gfx.cp_ecc_error_irq is retired in gfx11. In gfx_v11_0_hw_fini still use amdgpu_irq_put to disable this interrupt, which caused the call trace in this function.
[ 102.873958] Call Trace: [ 102.873959] [ 102.873961] gfx_v11_0_hw_fini+0x23/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 102.874019] gfx_v11_0_suspend+0xe/0x20 [amdgpu] [ 102.874072] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x240/0x460 [amdgpu] [ 102.874122] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x3d/0x80 [amdgpu] [ 102.874172] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xd9/0x490 [amdgpu] [ 102.874223] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x548/0xce6 [amdgpu] [ 102.874321] amdgpu_debugfs_reset_work+0x4c/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 102.874375] process_one_work+0x21f/0x3f0 [ 102.874377] worker_thread+0x200/0x3e0 [ 102.874378] ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0 [ 102.874379] kthread+0xfd/0x130 [ 102.874380] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 102.874381] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
v2: - Handle umc and gfx ras cases in separated patch - Retired the gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs in gfx11
v3: - Improve the subject and code comments - Add judgment on gfx11 in the function of amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init
v4: - Drop the define of CP_ME1_PIPE_INST_ADDR_INTERVAL and SET_ECC_ME_PIPE_STATE which using in gfx_v11_0_set_cp_ecc_error_state - Check cp_ecc_error_irq.funcs rather than ip version for a more sustainable life
v5: - Simplify judgment conditions
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-53628"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-07T16:15:45Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: drop gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs\n\nThe gfx.cp_ecc_error_irq is retired in gfx11. In gfx_v11_0_hw_fini still\nuse amdgpu_irq_put to disable this interrupt, which caused the call trace\nin this function.\n\n[ 102.873958] Call Trace:\n[ 102.873959] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 102.873961] gfx_v11_0_hw_fini+0x23/0x1e0 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874019] gfx_v11_0_suspend+0xe/0x20 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874072] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x240/0x460 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874122] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x3d/0x80 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874172] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xd9/0x490 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874223] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x548/0xce6 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874321] amdgpu_debugfs_reset_work+0x4c/0x70 [amdgpu]\n[ 102.874375] process_one_work+0x21f/0x3f0\n[ 102.874377] worker_thread+0x200/0x3e0\n[ 102.874378] ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0\n[ 102.874379] kthread+0xfd/0x130\n[ 102.874380] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20\n[ 102.874381] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n\nv2:\n- Handle umc and gfx ras cases in separated patch\n- Retired the gfx_v11_0_cp_ecc_error_irq_funcs in gfx11\n\nv3:\n- Improve the subject and code comments\n- Add judgment on gfx11 in the function of amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init\n\nv4:\n- Drop the define of CP_ME1_PIPE_INST_ADDR_INTERVAL and\nSET_ECC_ME_PIPE_STATE which using in gfx_v11_0_set_cp_ecc_error_state\n- Check cp_ecc_error_irq.funcs rather than ip version for a more\nsustainable life\n\nv5:\n- Simplify judgment conditions",
"id": "GHSA-4mh8-7crp-48x9",
"modified": "2026-02-04T00:30:26Z",
"published": "2025-10-07T18:31:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31b07aec4a2bdcab00770ea3a18efe49734ce153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/720b47229a5b24061d1c2e29ddb6043a59178d79"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b5a8a23acbc3ee50b23602b61db1563561faf84"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.