GHSA-4JWG-G8H6-9GV7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-23 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of hlen in bpf_flow_dissect()

bpf_flow_dissect() sanitizes the offsets returned by the BPF program with clamp_t(u16, ..., hlen).

If hlen is bigger than 65535, the upper bound is truncated before the comparison. For instance, with hlen == 65536, both nhoff and thoff are forced to zero, even if the program returned sane values.

This is the same class of bug as the one fixed in commit 99bda1ecbd56 ("flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff"). That fix does not cover the BPF path, because __skb_flow_dissect() returns early when a BPF flow dissector handles the packet.

struct bpf_flow_keys stores nhoff and thoff as u16, so cap hlen to U16_MAX before clamping.

Found by sashiko while reviewing the commit above.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98950"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T13:17:16Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nflow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of hlen in bpf_flow_dissect()\n\nbpf_flow_dissect() sanitizes the offsets returned by the BPF program\nwith clamp_t(u16, ..., hlen).\n\nIf hlen is bigger than 65535, the upper bound is truncated before\nthe comparison. For instance, with hlen == 65536, both nhoff and\nthoff are forced to zero, even if the program returned sane values.\n\nThis is the same class of bug as the one fixed in commit 99bda1ecbd56\n(\"flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb-\u003elen when computing\nthoff\"). That fix does not cover the BPF path, because\n__skb_flow_dissect() returns early when a BPF flow dissector\nhandles the packet.\n\nstruct bpf_flow_keys stores nhoff and thoff as u16, so cap hlen\nto U16_MAX before clamping.\n\nFound by sashiko while reviewing the commit above.",
  "id": "GHSA-4jwg-g8h6-9gv7",
  "modified": "2026-10-23T15:31:32Z",
  "published": "2026-10-23T15:31:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98950"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3fb5ad2951a6df92c98f4f06cd70f20c50a2eb2a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61b43a51a55929ec040bee3ea51af2121b956d05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c44c02c930c6583b235a1937c69ff716c4bb4514"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc18eb0e9941162c03f03f411ed7f6c339d91fa0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f202578efc738b883cfa04889eb97328914265a7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.