GHSA-4J8X-6QX9-P4GC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-07-25 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: accel: bmc150: clamp the device-reported FIFO frame count
__bmc150_accel_fifo_flush() copies the number of samples the device reports in its hardware FIFO into an on-stack buffer
u16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
which is sized for at most BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH (32) samples. The frame count is read from the FIFO_STATUS register and only masked to its 7 valid bits:
count = val & 0x7F;
so it can be 0..127. The only other limit applied to it is the optional caller-supplied sample budget:
if (samples && count > samples)
count = samples;
which does not constrain count on the flush-all path (samples == 0), and leaves it well above 32 whenever samples is larger. count samples are then transferred into buffer[]:
bmc150_accel_fifo_transfer(data, (u8 *)buffer, count);
bmc150_accel_fifo_transfer() reads count * 6 bytes through regmap, so a malfunctioning, malicious or counterfeit accelerometer (or an attacker tampering with the I2C/SPI bus) that reports up to 127 frames writes up to 762 bytes into the 192-byte buffer: a stack out-of-bounds write of up to 570 bytes that clobbers the stack canary, saved registers and the return address.
Clamp count to BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH, the number of samples buffer[] is sized for, before the transfer, mirroring the watermark clamp already done in bmc150_accel_set_watermark(). A well-formed flush reports at most BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH frames, so legitimate devices are unaffected.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-64504"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-25T10:17:36Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niio: accel: bmc150: clamp the device-reported FIFO frame count\n\n__bmc150_accel_fifo_flush() copies the number of samples the device\nreports in its hardware FIFO into an on-stack buffer\n\n\tu16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];\n\nwhich is sized for at most BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH (32) samples. The\nframe count is read from the FIFO_STATUS register and only masked to its\n7 valid bits:\n\n\tcount = val \u0026 0x7F;\n\nso it can be 0..127. The only other limit applied to it is the optional\ncaller-supplied sample budget:\n\n\tif (samples \u0026\u0026 count \u003e samples)\n\t\tcount = samples;\n\nwhich does not constrain count on the flush-all path (samples == 0), and\nleaves it well above 32 whenever samples is larger. count samples are\nthen transferred into buffer[]:\n\n\tbmc150_accel_fifo_transfer(data, (u8 *)buffer, count);\n\nbmc150_accel_fifo_transfer() reads count * 6 bytes through regmap, so a\nmalfunctioning, malicious or counterfeit accelerometer (or an attacker\ntampering with the I2C/SPI bus) that reports up to 127 frames writes up\nto 762 bytes into the 192-byte buffer: a stack out-of-bounds write of up\nto 570 bytes that clobbers the stack canary, saved registers and the\nreturn address.\n\nClamp count to BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH, the number of samples buffer[]\nis sized for, before the transfer, mirroring the watermark clamp already\ndone in bmc150_accel_set_watermark(). A well-formed flush reports at most\nBMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH frames, so legitimate devices are unaffected.",
"id": "GHSA-4j8x-6qx9-p4gc",
"modified": "2026-07-25T12:31:38Z",
"published": "2026-07-25T12:31:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64504"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fe0531dd73eff1de0f2584cb77716d645e548d5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35a3cd8fd65e15029eb90f1e510045b1bb071175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e766526827acd542bcd36c20c4d5f397e0f6521"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89f4a4ca0ac3a933c750569a771c079a290b0721"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5a9f521e0a49a0266200fd535b32a9668ecb33b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfffc98f3de92e0f76be7c7b72e63ac1776a6dbc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce0e1cae26096fe959a0da5563a6d6d5a801d5fb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0e6d924a5484e005cae5aff6a0aa07a22f3c9ff"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.