GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4J4W-3WCX-MXG6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-25 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-19 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

virtio-net: xsk: rx: fix the frame's length check

When calling buf_to_xdp, the len argument is the frame data's length without virtio header's length (vi->hdr_len). We check that len with

xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() + vi->hdr_len

to ensure the provided len does not larger than the allocated chunk size. The additional vi->hdr_len is because in virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk, we use part of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM for virtio header and ask the vhost to start placing data from

hard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - vi->hdr_len

not hard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM

But the first buffer has virtio_header, so the maximum frame's length in the first buffer can only be

xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size()

not xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() + vi->hdr_len

like in the current check.

This commit adds an additional argument to buf_to_xdp differentiate between the first buffer and other ones to correctly calculate the maximum frame's length.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38413"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-25T14:15:33Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvirtio-net: xsk: rx: fix the frame\u0027s length check\n\nWhen calling buf_to_xdp, the len argument is the frame data\u0027s length\nwithout virtio header\u0027s length (vi-\u003ehdr_len). We check that len with\n\n\txsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() + vi-\u003ehdr_len\n\nto ensure the provided len does not larger than the allocated chunk\nsize. The additional vi-\u003ehdr_len is because in virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk,\nwe use part of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM for virtio header and ask the vhost\nto start placing data from\n\n\thard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - vi-\u003ehdr_len\nnot\n\thard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM\n\nBut the first buffer has virtio_header, so the maximum frame\u0027s length in\nthe first buffer can only be\n\n\txsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size()\nnot\n\txsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size() + vi-\u003ehdr_len\n\nlike in the current check.\n\nThis commit adds an additional argument to buf_to_xdp differentiate\nbetween the first buffer and other ones to correctly calculate the maximum\nframe\u0027s length.",
  "id": "GHSA-4j4w-3wcx-mxg6",
  "modified": "2025-11-19T18:31:16Z",
  "published": "2025-07-25T15:30:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38413"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5177373c31318c3c6a190383bfd232e6cf565c36"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6013bb6bc24c2cac3f45b37a15b71b232a5b00ff"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/892f6ed9a4a38bb3360fdff091b9241cfa105b61"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…