GHSA-4J36-WMCJ-5Q44
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:45 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:45
VLAI
Details
SQL injection vulnerability in WordPress 1.5.2, and possibly other versions before 2.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the User-Agent field in an HTTP header for a comment.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1012"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-03-06T21:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "SQL injection vulnerability in WordPress 1.5.2, and possibly other versions before 2.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the User-Agent field in an HTTP header for a comment.",
"id": "GHSA-4j36-wmcj-5q44",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:45:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:45:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1012"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19109"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-01.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16950"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…