GHSA-4H2C-GW77-F478
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 09:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation
Computing the effects of a TLB invalidation involves looking at the size of the mapping cached by the TLB. For S1 mappings such as VNCR, this is deducted from the combination of the base granule size and the mapping level.
However, this implies that the S1 MMU is on. When the MMU is off, we indicate this with the level being set to a "creative" value of -127 (S1_MMU_DISABLED).
This ends-up being misinterpreted by pgshift_level_to_ttl() as it doesn't handle negative levels at all (the level is immediately cast to a u8 and only the bottom two bits considered), leading to an invalidation size of 0. Not helpful.
Tidy-up pgshift_level_to_ttl() to handle these negative levels, and ttl_to_size() to always return SZ_1G when no valid TTL is present. This allows the removal of open-coded checks for similar situations.
Note that the check for a negative value not explicitely checking for S1_MMU_DISABLED is deliberate, so that actual negative levels introduced with LVA2 and D128 can take the same path if we ever support them.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89775"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T09:17:07Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation\n\nComputing the effects of a TLB invalidation involves looking at\nthe size of the mapping cached by the TLB. For S1 mappings such as\nVNCR, this is deducted from the combination of the base granule size\nand the mapping level.\n\nHowever, this implies that the S1 MMU is *on*. When the MMU is off,\nwe indicate this with the level being set to a \"creative\" value of\n-127 (S1_MMU_DISABLED).\n\nThis ends-up being misinterpreted by pgshift_level_to_ttl() as it\ndoesn\u0027t handle negative levels at all (the level is immediately cast\nto a u8 and only the bottom two bits considered), leading to an\ninvalidation size of 0. Not helpful.\n\nTidy-up pgshift_level_to_ttl() to handle these negative levels, and\nttl_to_size() to always return SZ_1G when no valid TTL is present.\nThis allows the removal of open-coded checks for similar situations.\n\nNote that the check for a negative value not explicitely checking for\nS1_MMU_DISABLED is deliberate, so that actual negative levels introduced\nwith LVA2 and D128 can take the same path if we ever support them.",
"id": "GHSA-4h2c-gw77-f478",
"modified": "2026-09-16T18:31:57Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T09:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89775"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c9fca34b9625a67a7f1a03c8604f3df760c6c49"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8053393680d4fa3eb962667d2be95dd39f0940e5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be54a70067c7dbe1381157e8a238fa4b16ea9c05"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/16/14"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.