GHSA-4GCP-C78X-X35M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-18 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load
check_atomic_load() calls check_load_mem() before atomic_ptr_type_ok(). For a load-acquire that fetches into its own source register (dst_reg == src_reg), check_load_mem() overwrites src_reg's type with the type of the loaded value, so the subsequent atomic_ptr_type_ok() no longer sees the source pointer and fails to reject the disallowed types (ctx, pkt, flow_keys, sock).
Since bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() does not rewrite atomic loads, the raw access to the underlying kernel object is left in place. The destination type is taken from the ctx access itself, so a load-acquire of the sk field of struct __sk_buff for example leaves the register typed as PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL, which type_is_sk_pointer() does not match either, while it actually holds unconverted struct sk_buff bytes. Once the NULL check has passed this is a type confusion, not just a leak of kernel data.
Validate src_reg with check_reg_arg() and check the source pointer type with atomic_ptr_type_ok() before the load again, mirroring check_atomic_rmw(). Out-of-range register numbers are already rejected earlier by check_and_resolve_insns() (commit 503d21ef8eac ("bpf: Do register range validation early")), and the only exemption there, is_stack_arg_ldx(), requires BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW and thus never matches a BPF_ATOMIC insn. atomic_ptr_type_ok() can therefore not dereference register state out of bounds, that is, the out-of-bounds read addressed by the Fixes commit below does not reappear (as proven also via selftest).
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-90312"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:28Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load\n\ncheck_atomic_load() calls check_load_mem() before atomic_ptr_type_ok().\nFor a load-acquire that fetches into its own source register (dst_reg ==\nsrc_reg), check_load_mem() overwrites src_reg\u0027s type with the type of the\nloaded value, so the subsequent atomic_ptr_type_ok() no longer sees the\nsource pointer and fails to reject the disallowed types (ctx, pkt,\nflow_keys, sock).\n\nSince bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() does not rewrite atomic loads, the raw\naccess to the underlying kernel object is left in place. The destination\ntype is taken from the ctx access itself, so a load-acquire of the sk\nfield of struct __sk_buff for example leaves the register typed as\nPTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL, which type_is_sk_pointer() does not match\neither, while it actually holds unconverted struct sk_buff bytes. Once\nthe NULL check has passed this is a type confusion, not just a leak of\nkernel data.\n\nValidate src_reg with check_reg_arg() and check the source pointer type\nwith atomic_ptr_type_ok() before the load again, mirroring\ncheck_atomic_rmw(). Out-of-range register numbers are already rejected\nearlier by check_and_resolve_insns() (commit 503d21ef8eac (\"bpf: Do\nregister range validation early\")), and the only exemption there,\nis_stack_arg_ldx(), requires BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW and thus never\nmatches a BPF_ATOMIC insn. atomic_ptr_type_ok() can therefore not\ndereference register state out of bounds, that is, the out-of-bounds\nread addressed by the Fixes commit below does not reappear (as proven\nalso via selftest).",
"id": "GHSA-4gcp-c78x-x35m",
"modified": "2026-09-18T18:31:29Z",
"published": "2026-09-17T18:32:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90312"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/422a416041172af1ac610736d5f556d22b31b115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ee7b00888498cf387dd30729e18a05328b94709"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b87803391baa7e0bef60549d8841f12e549ad057"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.