GHSA-46H3-R5W2-2VQQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs

nvmet_tcp_handle_h2c_data_pdu() accepts an H2CData PDU after only checking that its TTAG is a valid in-range command index and that the command's data buffers are mapped. It never checks that the target has actually solicited that data by sending an R2T for the command.

A remote host can abuse this. It submits a write command that takes the R2T path and, before the target transmits the R2T, sends an H2CData PDU for that command's tag. The data completes the command early, and when the command then fails synchronously (e.g. a length mismatch caught by nvmet_check_transfer_len()), it is completed a second time. Each completion calls nvmet_tcp_queue_response(), so the same command is added to queue->resp_list twice while it is still linked; the second llist_add() makes the node point to itself (lentry->next == lentry).

nvmet_tcp_process_resp_list() then walks that self-referential node and adds the command to resp_send_list twice. With CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST this trips the "list_add double add" check (kernel BUG); without it the loop never terminates and the nvmet_tcp workqueue wedges (soft-lockup). It is remotely triggerable and needs no authentication on an allow_any_host subsystem.

Track whether an R2T has been transmitted for a command and reject an H2CData PDU that arrives before it. The flag is cleared on command reuse (nvmet_tcp_get_cmd() zeroes cmd->flags) and stays set across the multiple H2CData PDUs of a single solicited transfer.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89968"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:17:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs\n\nnvmet_tcp_handle_h2c_data_pdu() accepts an H2CData PDU after only checking\nthat its TTAG is a valid in-range command index and that the command\u0027s\ndata buffers are mapped. It never checks that the target has actually\nsolicited that data by sending an R2T for the command.\n\nA remote host can abuse this. It submits a write command that takes the\nR2T path and, before the target transmits the R2T, sends an H2CData PDU\nfor that command\u0027s tag. The data completes the command early, and when\nthe command then fails synchronously (e.g. a length mismatch caught by\nnvmet_check_transfer_len()), it is completed a second time. Each\ncompletion calls nvmet_tcp_queue_response(), so the same command is added\nto queue-\u003eresp_list twice while it is still linked; the second llist_add()\nmakes the node point to itself (lentry-\u003enext == lentry).\n\nnvmet_tcp_process_resp_list() then walks that self-referential node and\nadds the command to resp_send_list twice. With CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST this\ntrips the \"list_add double add\" check (kernel BUG); without it the loop\nnever terminates and the nvmet_tcp workqueue wedges (soft-lockup). It is\nremotely triggerable and needs no authentication on an allow_any_host\nsubsystem.\n\nTrack whether an R2T has been transmitted for a command and reject an\nH2CData PDU that arrives before it. The flag is cleared on command reuse\n(nvmet_tcp_get_cmd() zeroes cmd-\u003eflags) and stays set across the multiple\nH2CData PDUs of a single solicited transfer.",
  "id": "GHSA-46h3-r5w2-2vqq",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T15:31:03Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T12:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89968"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02341ee424fb2eed16b5b8a9d247492e49335c21"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14beef7d4f123fb458fc9844aa74a071871dcca6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cbed7538946c99e585acefd11c9ba3a0bdbae05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b71f9193e3d3a352920ba367f1a6db345249038"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fb527103e53fd43a8e802c2eca407869c204f7a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cade124c06f8e738e3a0df285ed2e08953e6bfaa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf1484d9a75de6809ef331e16f525aaa41b0e16d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db62b35cbca052860c519cbcabe7650708528738"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.