GHSA-45X6-9MH2-48PQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-12 12:31 – Updated: 2026-11-12 12:31
VLAI
Details

The MISP Modules website component contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the external tools management interface. The /external_tools/list endpoint returned stored API keys (the api_key field) in its JSON response via the ExternalTools model serializer. Additionally, the browser-based edit form pre-populated the API key input field with the stored credential value, exposing it in the DOM.

The /external_tools/list endpoint is accessible without authentication (the regression tests verify the response for both authenticated and unauthenticated clients), meaning any network-reachable client could retrieve the API keys for all configured external tools. These keys are used by the server to authenticate submissions to external analysis or enrichment services, so their disclosure allows an attacker to impersonate the MISP instance or directly access those external services.

The vulnerability also affected the edit workflow: the change_config endpoint previously required the API key to be present and non-empty on every save, forcing the key to round-trip through the client. The browser JavaScript stored the key in a reactive state object and updated the in-memory tool list with the credential value, further increasing the window of exposure in client-side memory and network traffic.

Affected component: the website sub-application of MISP Modules, specifically the external_tools module (serializer in models.py, list endpoint, and the external_tools_index.html template). The impact is limited to confidentiality of the stored API keys; no integrity or availability impact on the MISP Modules website itself is indicated by the patch.

Severity
9.2 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-127046"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-11-12T12:18:23Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The MISP Modules website component contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the external tools management interface. The /external_tools/list endpoint returned stored API keys (the api_key field) in its JSON response via the ExternalTools model serializer. Additionally, the browser-based edit form pre-populated the API key input field with the stored credential value, exposing it in the DOM.\n\nThe /external_tools/list endpoint is accessible without authentication (the regression tests verify the response for both authenticated and unauthenticated clients), meaning any network-reachable client could retrieve the API keys for all configured external tools. These keys are used by the server to authenticate submissions to external analysis or enrichment services, so their disclosure allows an attacker to impersonate the MISP instance or directly access those external services.\n\nThe vulnerability also affected the edit workflow: the change_config endpoint previously required the API key to be present and non-empty on every save, forcing the key to round-trip through the client. The browser JavaScript stored the key in a reactive state object and updated the in-memory tool list with the credential value, further increasing the window of exposure in client-side memory and network traffic.\n\nAffected component: the website sub-application of MISP Modules, specifically the external_tools module (serializer in models.py, list endpoint, and the external_tools_index.html template). The impact is limited to confidentiality of the stored API keys; no integrity or availability impact on the MISP Modules website itself is indicated by the patch.",
  "id": "GHSA-45x6-9mh2-48pq",
  "modified": "2026-11-12T12:31:37Z",
  "published": "2026-11-12T12:31:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-127046"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/MISP/misp-modules/commit/61c27893066cee80d9711649765ebc2bccd0e4af"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.