GHSA-45W6-5FRG-3VFQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fuse: re-lock request before replacing page cache folio

fuse_try_move_folio() unlocks the request on entry but does not re-lock it on the success path. This means fuse_chan_abort() can end the request and free the fuse_io_args (eg fuse_readpages_end()) while the subsequent copy chain logic after fuse_try_move_folio() accesses the fuse_io_args, leading to use-after-free issues.

Fix this by calling lock_request() before replace_page_cache_folio(). This ensures the request is locked on the success path which will prevent the fuse_io_args from being freed while the later copying logic runs, and also ensures that the ap->folios[i]->mapping is never null since ap->folios[i] will always point to the newfolio after replace_page_cache_folio().

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53388"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T12:16:49Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfuse: re-lock request before replacing page cache folio\n\nfuse_try_move_folio() unlocks the request on entry but does not\nre-lock it on the success path. This means fuse_chan_abort() can end the\nrequest and free the fuse_io_args (eg fuse_readpages_end()) while the\nsubsequent copy chain logic after fuse_try_move_folio() accesses the\nfuse_io_args, leading to use-after-free issues.\n\nFix this by calling lock_request() before replace_page_cache_folio().\nThis ensures the request is locked on the success path which will\nprevent the fuse_io_args from being freed while the later copying logic\nruns, and also ensures that the ap-\u003efolios[i]-\u003emapping is never null\nsince ap-\u003efolios[i] will always point to the newfolio after\nreplace_page_cache_folio().",
  "id": "GHSA-45w6-5frg-3vfq",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:44Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T12:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53388"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0223f452532d9cd8a5e87c45de828fd93c99bd25"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/030fe3e9d8abdee303dd7e9e42f45082d382a407"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46473ddccdc5065033e397d6e62c280dbcd3d9c2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5927b43a4f8d89e86930f524bf63e9c7e66f61b4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c18691e0cfda29672f79bafde8abdb7710674f6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a078484921052d0badd827fcc2770b5cfc1d4120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af2892249d982a1c036ca456cc135374e68b6677"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e28db6ac4792d065ab32565fd9f0a2361c3d4666"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…