GHSA-4589-RC6P-3W23

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-18 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI: dwc: ep: Flush cached MSI write before unmapping the iATU

The MSI-X path already flushes any posted MSI-X write before tearing down its iATU mapping. That was added by commit c22533c66cca ("PCI: dwc: ep: Flush MSI-X write before unmapping its ATU entry") to make sure the write reaches the Root Complex before the outbound window that translates it disappears.

The MSI path has the same problem but no equivalent flush. When the Endpoint driver caches an MSI target address and later observes that the Root Complex has changed it, dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() unmaps the existing iATU entry and reprograms it for the new address. Between the last MSI writel() and the unmap there may still be a posted write sitting in the fabric, and unmapping the iATU entry can drop or misroute that write.

Fix this by reading back from the mapped MSI window before the unmap. The readback drains any posted MSI writes through the same iATU entry that mapped them, which is the same logic the MSI-X path uses.

[mani: commit log]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90332"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: dwc: ep: Flush cached MSI write before unmapping the iATU\n\nThe MSI-X path already flushes any posted MSI-X write before tearing down\nits iATU mapping. That was added by commit c22533c66cca (\"PCI: dwc: ep:\nFlush MSI-X write before unmapping its ATU entry\") to make sure the write\nreaches the Root Complex before the outbound window that translates it\ndisappears.\n\nThe MSI path has the same problem but no equivalent flush. When the\nEndpoint driver caches an MSI target address and later observes that the\nRoot Complex has changed it, dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() unmaps the existing\niATU entry and reprograms it for the new address. Between the last MSI\nwritel() and the unmap there may still be a posted write sitting in the\nfabric, and unmapping the iATU entry can drop or misroute that write.\n\nFix this by reading back from the mapped MSI window before the unmap. The\nreadback drains any posted MSI writes through the same iATU entry that\nmapped them, which is the same logic the MSI-X path uses.\n\n[mani: commit log]",
  "id": "GHSA-4589-rc6p-3w23",
  "modified": "2026-09-18T18:31:30Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:32:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90332"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1b01d725d8b42450b86a857bab3c46856c740166"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/914704c7b318bdaa42dce4e55f6c492190fee3b5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.