GHSA-44HX-9778-XH92
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-27 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to account dirty data in __get_secs_required()
It will trigger system panic w/ testcase in [1]:
------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2752! RIP: 0010:new_curseg+0xc81/0x2110 Call Trace: f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x1c91/0x4540 do_write_page+0x163/0xdf0 f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x1aa/0x340 f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x797/0x2280 f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x16cd/0x2190 f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x994/0x1c80 f2fs_write_data_pages+0x9cc/0xea0 do_writepages+0x194/0x7a0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x12b/0x1a0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xbb/0xf0 file_write_and_wait_range+0xa1/0x110 f2fs_do_sync_file+0x26f/0x1c50 f2fs_sync_file+0x12b/0x1d0 vfs_fsync_range+0xfa/0x230 do_fsync+0x3d/0x80 __x64_sys_fsync+0x37/0x50 x64_sys_call+0x1e88/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The root cause is if checkpoint_disabling and lfs_mode are both on, it will trigger OPU for all overwritten data, it may cost more free segment than expected, so f2fs must account those data correctly to calculate cosumed free segments later, and return ENOSPC earlier to avoid run out of free segment during block allocation.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20241015025106.3203676-1-chao@kernel.org/
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-53220"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-27T14:15:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to account dirty data in __get_secs_required()\n\nIt will trigger system panic w/ testcase in [1]:\n\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2752!\nRIP: 0010:new_curseg+0xc81/0x2110\nCall Trace:\n f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x1c91/0x4540\n do_write_page+0x163/0xdf0\n f2fs_outplace_write_data+0x1aa/0x340\n f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x797/0x2280\n f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x16cd/0x2190\n f2fs_write_cache_pages+0x994/0x1c80\n f2fs_write_data_pages+0x9cc/0xea0\n do_writepages+0x194/0x7a0\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x12b/0x1a0\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xbb/0xf0\n file_write_and_wait_range+0xa1/0x110\n f2fs_do_sync_file+0x26f/0x1c50\n f2fs_sync_file+0x12b/0x1d0\n vfs_fsync_range+0xfa/0x230\n do_fsync+0x3d/0x80\n __x64_sys_fsync+0x37/0x50\n x64_sys_call+0x1e88/0x20d0\n do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nThe root cause is if checkpoint_disabling and lfs_mode are both on,\nit will trigger OPU for all overwritten data, it may cost more free\nsegment than expected, so f2fs must account those data correctly to\ncalculate cosumed free segments later, and return ENOSPC earlier to\navoid run out of free segment during block allocation.\n\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20241015025106.3203676-1-chao@kernel.org/",
"id": "GHSA-44hx-9778-xh92",
"modified": "2025-11-03T21:31:50Z",
"published": "2024-12-27T15:31:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1acd73edbbfef2c3c5b43cba4006a7797eca7050"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e58b2987960efcd917bc42da781cee256213618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9313b85ddc120e2d2f0efaf86d0204d4c98d60b1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e812871c068cc0f91ff9f5cee87d00df1c44aae4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b8bfe8d2f2fdf905d37c174d5bc1cd2b6910c5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.