GHSA-445C-VH5M-36RJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-10 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-14 00:13
VLAI?
Summary
Apache Log4j Core: log injection in `Rfc5424Layout` due to silent configuration incompatibility
Details
Apache Log4j Core's Rfc5424Layout, in versions 2.21.0 through 2.25.3, is vulnerable to log injection via CRLF sequences due to undocumented renames of security-relevant configuration attributes.
Two distinct issues affect users of stream-based syslog services who configure Rfc5424Layout directly:
- The
newLineEscapeattribute was silently renamed, causing newline escaping to stop working for users of TCP framing (RFC 6587), exposing them to CRLF injection in log output. - The
useTlsMessageFormatattribute was silently renamed, causing users of TLS framing (RFC 5425) to be silently downgraded to unframed TCP (RFC 6587), without newline escaping.
Users of the SyslogAppender are not affected, as its configuration attributes were not modified.
Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.21.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.25.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0-beta1"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.0.0-beta3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34478"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-117",
"CWE-684"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T00:13:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-10T16:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Apache Log4j Core\u0027s [`Rfc5424Layout`](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#RFC5424Layout), in versions 2.21.0 through 2.25.3, is vulnerable to log injection via CRLF sequences due to undocumented renames of security-relevant configuration attributes.\n\nTwo distinct issues affect users of stream-based syslog services who configure Rfc5424Layout directly:\n\n * The `newLineEscape` attribute was silently renamed, causing newline escaping to stop working for users of TCP framing (RFC 6587), exposing them to CRLF injection in log output.\n * The `useTlsMessageFormat` attribute was silently renamed, causing users of TLS framing (RFC 5425) to be silently downgraded to unframed TCP (RFC 6587), without newline escaping.\n\nUsers of the `SyslogAppender` are not affected, as its configuration attributes were not modified.\n\nUsers are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-445c-vh5m-36rj",
"modified": "2026-04-14T00:13:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-10T18:31:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/4074"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/3k1clr2l6vkdnl4cbhjrnt1nyjvb5gwt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/cyclonedx/vdr.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html#RFC5424Layout"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/security.html#CVE-2026-34478"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/10/7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Log4j Core: log injection in `Rfc5424Layout` due to silent configuration incompatibility"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…