GHSA-43X8-VPH3-W4WC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-10 09:32 – Updated: 2026-10-15 03:34
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf/x86/intel: Fix crash in icl_update_topdown_event()

The perf_fuzzer found a hard-lockup crash on a RaptorLake machine:

Oops: general protection fault, maybe for address 0xffff89aeceab400: 0000 CPU: 23 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/23 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision 9660/0VJ762 RIP: 0010:native_read_pmc+0x7/0x40 Code: cc e8 8d a9 01 00 48 89 03 5b cd cc cc cc cc 0f 1f ... RSP: 000:fffb03100273de8 EFLAGS: 00010046 .... Call Trace: icl_update_topdown_event+0x165/0x190 ? ktime_get+0x38/0xd0 intel_pmu_read_event+0xf9/0x210 __perf_event_read+0xf9/0x210

CPUs 16-23 are E-core CPUs that don't support the perf metrics feature. The icl_update_topdown_event() should not be invoked on these CPUs.

It's a regression of commit:

f9bdf1f95339 ("perf/x86/intel: Avoid disable PMU if !cpuc->enabled in sample read")

The bug introduced by that commit is that the is_topdown_event() function is mistakenly used to replace the is_topdown_count() call to check if the topdown functions for the perf metrics feature should be invoked.

Fix it.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38322"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-10T09:15:26Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/x86/intel: Fix crash in icl_update_topdown_event()\n\nThe perf_fuzzer found a hard-lockup crash on a RaptorLake machine:\n\n  Oops: general protection fault, maybe for address 0xffff89aeceab400: 0000\n  CPU: 23 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/23\n  Tainted: [W]=WARN\n  Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision 9660/0VJ762\n  RIP: 0010:native_read_pmc+0x7/0x40\n  Code: cc e8 8d a9 01 00 48 89 03 5b cd cc cc cc cc 0f 1f ...\n  RSP: 000:fffb03100273de8 EFLAGS: 00010046\n  ....\n  Call Trace:\n    \u003cTASK\u003e\n    icl_update_topdown_event+0x165/0x190\n    ? ktime_get+0x38/0xd0\n    intel_pmu_read_event+0xf9/0x210\n    __perf_event_read+0xf9/0x210\n\nCPUs 16-23 are E-core CPUs that don\u0027t support the perf metrics feature.\nThe icl_update_topdown_event() should not be invoked on these CPUs.\n\nIt\u0027s a regression of commit:\n\n  f9bdf1f95339 (\"perf/x86/intel: Avoid disable PMU if !cpuc-\u003eenabled in sample read\")\n\nThe bug introduced by that commit is that the is_topdown_event() function\nis mistakenly used to replace the is_topdown_count() call to check if the\ntopdown functions for the perf metrics feature should be invoked.\n\nFix it.",
  "id": "GHSA-43x8-vph3-w4wc",
  "modified": "2026-10-15T03:34:51Z",
  "published": "2025-07-10T09:32:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38322"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-032379.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-457936.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/702ea6028032d6c1fe96c2d4762a3575e3654819"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79e2dd573116d3338507c311460da9669095c94d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a85cc69acdcb05f8cd226b8ea0778b8e2e887e6f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0823d5fbacb1c551d793cbfe7af24e0d1fa45ed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e97c45c770f5e56c784a46c2a96ab968d26b97d9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.