GHSA-3XHM-M5H8-87G4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:14 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:17
VLAI
Details

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in PowerArchiver 8.10 through 9.5 Beta 4 and Beta 5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a (1) ACE or (2) ARJ archive.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-3061"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-09-27T19:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in PowerArchiver 8.10 through 9.5 Beta 4 and Beta 5 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a (1) ACE or (2) ARJ archive.",
  "id": "GHSA-3xhm-m5h8-87g4",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:17:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:14:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3061"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112748874211458\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16713"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-50/advisory"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14922"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…