GHSA-3WMJ-P44F-XCMR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:03 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:03
VLAI
Details
Multiple HTTP Response Splitting vulnerabilities in osCommerce 2.2 Milestone 2 and earlier allow remote attackers to spoof web content and poison web caches via hex-encoded CRLF ("%0d%0a") sequences in the (1) products_id or (2) pid parameter to index.php or (3) goto parameter to banner.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-1951"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-06-16T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple HTTP Response Splitting vulnerabilities in osCommerce 2.2 Milestone 2 and earlier allow remote attackers to spoof web content and poison web caches via hex-encoded CRLF (\"%0d%0a\") sequences in the (1) products_id or (2) pid parameter to index.php or (3) goto parameter to banner.php.",
"id": "GHSA-3wmj-p44f-xcmr",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:03:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:03:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111842744205117\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111936255011735\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15670"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gulftech.org/?node=research\u0026article_id=00080-06102005"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13979"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…