GHSA-3V45-F3VH-WG7M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 19:35 – Updated: 2026-06-19 19:35
VLAI
Summary
Oj: Stack Buffer Overflow in Oj.dump via Large Indent
Details

Summary

Oj.dump is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow when a large :indent value is provided by the developer. fill_indent in dump.h calls memset(indent_str, ' ', (size_t)opts->indent) without validating the size. When opts->indent is set to INT_MAX (2,147,483,647), the (size_t) cast preserves the large value and memset writes 2 GB into the stack-allocated out buffer (4,184 bytes), corrupting the stack and crashing the process.

Version

  • Software: oj gem
  • Affected: all versions with ext/oj/dump.h
  • Latest tested: 3.17.1 (confirmed present)

Details

ext/oj/dump.h, line 77:

static void fill_indent(Out out, int depth) {
    if (0 < out->opts->indent) {
        size_t len = (size_t)(out->opts->indent * depth);
        // ...
        memset(out->buf + ..., ' ', len);  // len = 2147483647 * depth

The indent option is accepted as a plain Ruby integer and stored as int without range validation. Multiplying by depth can produce a value larger than any stack or heap buffer.

ASAN report:

==69820==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fd1fc201278
WRITE of size 2147483647 at 0x7fd1fc201278 thread T0
    #0 memset
    #1 fill_indent  /ext/oj/dump.h:77
    #2 dump_array   /ext/oj/dump_compat.c:165
    #3 oj_dump_obj_to_json_using_params  /ext/oj/dump.c:818
    #4 dump_body    /ext/oj/oj.c:1429
    #5 dump         /ext/oj/oj.c:1480
Address is in stack of thread T0 at offset 4728 in frame:
    #0 dump /ext/oj/oj.c:1453
  [544, 4728) 'out'  <== Memory access at offset 4728 overflows this variable

Reproduce

require "oj"
obj = [0]
Oj.dump(obj, mode: :compat, indent: 2_147_483_647)

Workaround

The develop should not use extreme indents and should not offer the option for users to dump Ruby data with unlimited indentation size.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 3.17.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "oj"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.17.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54502"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-121"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T19:35:27Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`Oj.dump` is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow when a large `:indent` value is provided by the developer. `fill_indent` in `dump.h` calls `memset(indent_str, \u0027 \u0027, (size_t)opts-\u003eindent)` without validating the size. When `opts-\u003eindent` is set to `INT_MAX` (2,147,483,647), the `(size_t)` cast preserves the large value and `memset` writes 2 GB into the stack-allocated `out` buffer (4,184 bytes), corrupting the stack and crashing the process.\n\n### Version\n\n- **Software**: oj gem\n- **Affected**: all versions with `ext/oj/dump.h`\n- **Latest tested**: 3.17.1 (confirmed present)\n\n### Details\n\n`ext/oj/dump.h`, line 77:\n\n```c\nstatic void fill_indent(Out out, int depth) {\n    if (0 \u003c out-\u003eopts-\u003eindent) {\n        size_t len = (size_t)(out-\u003eopts-\u003eindent * depth);\n        // ...\n        memset(out-\u003ebuf + ..., \u0027 \u0027, len);  // len = 2147483647 * depth\n```\n\nThe `indent` option is accepted as a plain Ruby integer and stored as `int` without range validation. Multiplying by `depth` can produce a value larger than any stack or heap buffer.\n\nASAN report:\n```\n==69820==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fd1fc201278\nWRITE of size 2147483647 at 0x7fd1fc201278 thread T0\n    #0 memset\n    #1 fill_indent  /ext/oj/dump.h:77\n    #2 dump_array   /ext/oj/dump_compat.c:165\n    #3 oj_dump_obj_to_json_using_params  /ext/oj/dump.c:818\n    #4 dump_body    /ext/oj/oj.c:1429\n    #5 dump         /ext/oj/oj.c:1480\nAddress is in stack of thread T0 at offset 4728 in frame:\n    #0 dump /ext/oj/oj.c:1453\n  [544, 4728) \u0027out\u0027  \u003c== Memory access at offset 4728 overflows this variable\n```\n\n### Reproduce\n\n```ruby\nrequire \"oj\"\nobj = [0]\nOj.dump(obj, mode: :compat, indent: 2_147_483_647)\n```\n\n### Workaround\n\nThe develop should not use extreme indents and should not offer the option for users to dump Ruby data with unlimited indentation size.",
  "id": "GHSA-3v45-f3vh-wg7m",
  "modified": "2026-06-19T19:35:27Z",
  "published": "2026-06-19T19:35:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ohler55/oj/security/advisories/GHSA-3v45-f3vh-wg7m"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ohler55/oj"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Oj: Stack Buffer Overflow in Oj.dump via Large Indent"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…