GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-3QR3-W8JF-GQ87

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-19 12:31 – Updated: 2025-02-13 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

io_uring/sqpoll: zero sqd->thread on tctx errors

Syzkeller reports:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in thread_group_cputime+0x409/0x700 kernel/sched/cputime.c:341 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88803578c510 by task syz.2.3223/27552 Call Trace: ... kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 thread_group_cputime+0x409/0x700 kernel/sched/cputime.c:341 thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0xa6/0x340 kernel/sched/cputime.c:639 getrusage+0x1000/0x1340 kernel/sys.c:1863 io_uring_show_fdinfo+0xdfe/0x1770 io_uring/fdinfo.c:197 seq_show+0x608/0x770 fs/proc/fd.c:68 ...

That's due to sqd->task not being cleared properly in cases where SQPOLL task tctx setup fails, which can essentially only happen with fault injection to insert allocation errors.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21633"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-19T11:15:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nio_uring/sqpoll: zero sqd-\u003ethread on tctx errors\n\nSyzkeller reports:\n\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in thread_group_cputime+0x409/0x700 kernel/sched/cputime.c:341\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff88803578c510 by task syz.2.3223/27552\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n  ...\n  kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602\n  thread_group_cputime+0x409/0x700 kernel/sched/cputime.c:341\n  thread_group_cputime_adjusted+0xa6/0x340 kernel/sched/cputime.c:639\n  getrusage+0x1000/0x1340 kernel/sys.c:1863\n  io_uring_show_fdinfo+0xdfe/0x1770 io_uring/fdinfo.c:197\n  seq_show+0x608/0x770 fs/proc/fd.c:68\n  ...\n\nThat\u0027s due to sqd-\u003etask not being cleared properly in cases where\nSQPOLL task tctx setup fails, which can essentially only happen with\nfault injection to insert allocation errors.",
  "id": "GHSA-3qr3-w8jf-gq87",
  "modified": "2025-02-13T15:31:22Z",
  "published": "2025-01-19T12:31:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21633"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b7cfa8b6c28a9fa22b86894166a1a34f6d630ba"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa7496d668c30ca7421b3bfdcd948ee861a13d17"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…