GHSA-3M56-382V-R3QQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:31 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: bridge: Reject descending VLAN tunnel ranges

A pair of descending VLAN and tunnel IDs can pass the tunnel range span check. The VLAN subtraction produces a negative int, which is converted to unsigned when compared with the u32 tunnel ID subtraction. It can therefore equal the wrapped tunnel ID delta.

The range loop then performs no iterations. Since the batched notification handling added a post-loop error check, this leaves err uninitialized and makes the request's return value unpredictable.

Reject descending VLAN ranges before comparing the spans. Valid ascending and single-entry ranges remain unchanged, while malformed descending ranges consistently return -EINVAL.

This issue was found by a static analysis checker and confirmed by manual source review.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-90114"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:17:03Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: bridge: Reject descending VLAN tunnel ranges\n\nA pair of descending VLAN and tunnel IDs can pass the tunnel range span\ncheck. The VLAN subtraction produces a negative int, which is converted\nto unsigned when compared with the u32 tunnel ID subtraction. It can\ntherefore equal the wrapped tunnel ID delta.\n\nThe range loop then performs no iterations. Since the batched\nnotification handling added a post-loop error check, this leaves err\nuninitialized and makes the request\u0027s return value unpredictable.\n\nReject descending VLAN ranges before comparing the spans. Valid\nascending and single-entry ranges remain unchanged, while malformed\ndescending ranges consistently return -EINVAL.\n\nThis issue was found by a static analysis checker and confirmed by\nmanual source review.",
  "id": "GHSA-3m56-382v-r3qq",
  "modified": "2026-09-17T18:31:52Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T18:31:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0874a6d5275091429ec4c675c54c53a8776665ae"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1181f6bad009408a259bab6aaf0681f11b487972"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/434849b21ef56b09d16e6366b2a230002f363e45"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b0f5b25f114651f03058395b490626c4444875e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a8e0e3a18b5e3172343b8479c5d04187f5b4795"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b74a072d8fb71d3c9ffba4a17d5943e63266fb38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd741b819ff1c239d26cc5b0f0e6b1fd4e67ed17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0444d7499f113d6b7803ef0175591464e17525e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…