GHSA-3JMW-C69H-426C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-09-01 18:26 – Updated: 2021-08-30 22:03
VLAI
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) can run untrusted code on Rundeck server
Details

Impact

A user with admin access to the system resource type is potentially vulnerable to a CSRF attack that could cause the server to run untrusted code on all Rundeck editions.

Patches

Available in Rundeck 3.4.3 and 3.3.14

Workarounds

Please visit https://rundeck.com/security for information about specific workarounds.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email us at security@rundeck.com

To report security issues to Rundeck please use the form at https://rundeck.com/security

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.rundeck:rundeck-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.rundeck:rundeck-core"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.14"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39133"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-30T22:03:39Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-08-30T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nA user with `admin` access to the `system` resource type is potentially vulnerable to a CSRF attack that could cause the server to run untrusted code on all Rundeck editions.\n\n### Patches\nAvailable in Rundeck 3.4.3 and 3.3.14\n\n\n### Workarounds\n\nPlease visit [https://rundeck.com/security](https://rundeck.com/security) for information about specific workarounds.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Email us at [security@rundeck.com](mailto:security@rundeck.com)\n\nTo report security issues to Rundeck please use the form at [https://rundeck.com/security](https://rundeck.com/security)",
  "id": "GHSA-3jmw-c69h-426c",
  "modified": "2021-08-30T22:03:39Z",
  "published": "2021-09-01T18:26:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/security/advisories/GHSA-3jmw-c69h-426c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39133"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck/commit/67c4eedeaf9509fc0b255aff15977a5229ef13b9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rundeck/rundeck"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) can run untrusted code on Rundeck server"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…