GHSA-3G95-JQMM-JR55
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-03 03:14 – Updated: 2022-05-03 03:14Race condition in the ia32 compatibility code for the execve system call in Linux kernel 2.4 before 2.4.31 and 2.6 before 2.6.6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (kernel panic) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a concurrent thread that increments a pointer count after the nargs function has counted the pointers, but before the count is copied from user space to kernel space, which leads to a buffer overflow.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-1768"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-07-11T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Race condition in the ia32 compatibility code for the execve system call in Linux kernel 2.4 before 2.4.31 and 2.6 before 2.6.6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (kernel panic) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a concurrent thread that increments a pointer count after the nargs function has counted the pointers, but before the count is copied from user space to kernel space, which leads to a buffer overflow.",
"id": "GHSA-3g95-jqmm-jr55",
"modified": "2022-05-03T03:14:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-03T03:14:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1768"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11117"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112110120216116\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15980"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17002"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18059"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19185"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19607"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014442"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-921"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_44_kernel.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-551.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.suresec.org/advisories/adv4.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1878"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.