GHSA-3FQ3-M842-MPF8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:13 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:13
VLAI
Details
The Bluetooth Classic implementation on the Texas Instruments CC256XCQFN-EM does not properly handle the reception of continuous LMP_AU_Rand packets, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger a denial of service (deadlock) of the device by flooding it with LMP_AU_Rand packets after the paging procedure.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-34149"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-09-07T07:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Bluetooth Classic implementation on the Texas Instruments CC256XCQFN-EM does not properly handle the reception of continuous LMP_AU_Rand packets, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger a denial of service (deadlock) of the device by flooding it with LMP_AU_Rand packets after the paging procedure.",
"id": "GHSA-3fq3-m842-mpf8",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:13:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:13:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34149"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://dl.packetstormsecurity.net/papers/general/braktooth.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ti.com/product/CC2564C"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ti.com/tool/CC256XC-BT-SP#primary-sw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…