GHSA-3F4Q-8X5M-76V8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-12 21:54 – Updated: 2026-11-12 21:54Impact
Active Storage's VideoPreviewer, VideoAnalyzer and AudioAnalyzer run ffmpeg and ffprobe on a blob's contents without restricting the input format, so FFmpeg selects a demuxer by probing the file. A blob created through a direct upload keeps the content type the client declared, so a client can store an HLS playlist under a video/* or audio/* type. When that blob is previewed or analyzed, the hls demuxer opens the file:// segments that the playlist names, and the preview image or the stored metadata could disclose a local media file that the application process can read and whose path the attacker knows.
Applications that accept uploads from untrusted users and generate video previews, or analyze video or audio attachments with FFmpeg, are affected.
Details
The fixed releases limit the formats FFmpeg may open to common audio and video containers, configured by the new config.active_storage.ffmpeg_allowed_formats setting. Files in other formats no longer preview or receive media metadata; the Active Storage CHANGELOG names some of them and shows how to add a format to the list.
Workarounds
Applications that cannot upgrade can stop Active Storage from running FFmpeg on uploaded files by removing ActiveStorage::Previewer::VideoPreviewer from config.active_storage.previewers, and ActiveStorage::Analyzer::VideoAnalyzer and ActiveStorage::Analyzer::AudioAnalyzer from config.active_storage.analyzers.
Releases
The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.
Patches for those who cannot upgrade at once: - 8.1: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/3b1f2627538dc597cd973530c08514a26c2b0282.patch - 8.0: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/69aff80d115bbb9d1e82fd6c6f2fd3ddeafb958b.patch
Credit
This issue was responsibly reported by HackerOne researcher w3rmut.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "activestorage"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.1.0.beta1"
},
{
"fixed": "8.1.4.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "activestorage"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.0.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-126188"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-11-12T21:54:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-11T00:18:47Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nActive Storage\u0027s `VideoPreviewer`, `VideoAnalyzer` and `AudioAnalyzer` run `ffmpeg` and `ffprobe` on a blob\u0027s contents without restricting the input format, so FFmpeg selects a demuxer by probing the file. A blob created through a direct upload keeps the content type the client declared, so a client can store an HLS playlist under a `video/*` or `audio/*` type. When that blob is previewed or analyzed, the `hls` demuxer opens the `file://` segments that the playlist names, and the preview image or the stored metadata could disclose a local media file that the application process can read and whose path the attacker knows.\n\nApplications that accept uploads from untrusted users and generate video previews, or analyze video or audio attachments with FFmpeg, are affected.\n\n### Details\nThe fixed releases limit the formats FFmpeg may open to common audio and video containers, configured by the new `config.active_storage.ffmpeg_allowed_formats` setting. Files in other formats no longer preview or receive media metadata; the Active Storage CHANGELOG names some of them and shows how to add a format to the list.\n\n### Workarounds\nApplications that cannot upgrade can stop Active Storage from running FFmpeg on uploaded files by removing `ActiveStorage::Previewer::VideoPreviewer` from `config.active_storage.previewers`, and `ActiveStorage::Analyzer::VideoAnalyzer` and `ActiveStorage::Analyzer::AudioAnalyzer` from `config.active_storage.analyzers`.\n\n### Releases\nThe fixed releases are available at the normal locations.\n\nPatches for those who cannot upgrade at once:\n- 8.1: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/3b1f2627538dc597cd973530c08514a26c2b0282.patch\n- 8.0: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/69aff80d115bbb9d1e82fd6c6f2fd3ddeafb958b.patch\n\n### Credit\nThis issue was responsibly reported by HackerOne researcher [w3rmut](https://hackerone.com/w3rmut).",
"id": "GHSA-3f4q-8x5m-76v8",
"modified": "2026-11-12T21:54:18Z",
"published": "2026-11-12T21:54:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/security/advisories/GHSA-3f4q-8x5m-76v8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-126188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/3b1f2627538dc597cd973530c08514a26c2b0282"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/69aff80d115bbb9d1e82fd6c6f2fd3ddeafb958b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.0.5.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.1.4.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/activestorage/GHSA-3f4q-8x5m-76v8.yml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Active Storage: Possible local file disclosure in video previews and analysis"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.