GHSA-3CV2-H65G-FGMM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-29 19:08 – Updated: 2026-05-29 19:08
VLAI
Summary
astral-tokio-tar has a PAX Header Desynchronization issue
Details

Impact

Versions of astral-tokio-tar prior to 0.6.2 contain a PAX header interpretation bug that allows manipulated entries to be made selectively visible or invisible during extraction with astral-tokio-tar versus other tar implementations. An attacker could use this differential to smuggle unexpected files onto a victim's filesystem.

Details

When a tar stream contains multiple "header" entries prior to a file entry, astral-tokio-tar applies the PAX header (x) to the next entry in the stream, regardless of type. For example, a stream of x -> L -> file (PAX, GNU longname, file) would result in x's extensions being applied to L rather than to file.

Per POSIX pax, this is incorrect: a PAX header always applies to a file entry, not any intermediary entries. See the "pax Header Block" section for the specific prescription there.

As a result of this, an attacker can contrive a tar containing a sequence of tar headers such that astral-tokio-tar applies the PAX header's size extension to the next header in sequence, effectively desynchronizing the stream and enabling astral-tokio-tar specific skippage/extraction of members. In other words, a file can be contrived to extract differently on astral-tokio-tar than on other tar parsers.

Patches

Versions 0.6.2 and newer of astral-tokio-tar address this differential.

Workarounds

Users are advised to upgrade to version 0.6.1 or newer to address this advisory.

There is no workaround other than upgrading. Users should experience no breaking changes as a result of the upgrade.

Resources

  • GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx is a similar PAX desynchronization bug
  • GHSA-fp55-jw48-c537 is another similar PAX desynchronization bug
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.6.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "astral-tokio-tar"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.6.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-843"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-29T19:08:23Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nVersions of astral-tokio-tar prior to 0.6.2 contain a PAX header interpretation bug that allows manipulated entries to be made selectively visible or invisible during extraction with astral-tokio-tar versus other tar implementations. An attacker could use this differential to smuggle unexpected files onto a victim\u0027s filesystem.\n\n### Details\n\nWhen a tar stream contains multiple \"header\" entries prior to a file entry, astral-tokio-tar applies the PAX header (`x`) to the next entry in the stream, regardless of type. For example, a stream of `x -\u003e L -\u003e file` (PAX, GNU longname, file) would result in `x`\u0027s extensions being applied to `L` rather than to `file`.\n\n[Per POSIX pax](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/pax.html), this is incorrect: a PAX header always applies to a file entry, not any intermediary entries. See the \"pax Header Block\" section for the specific prescription there.\n\nAs a result of this, an attacker can contrive a tar containing a sequence of tar headers such that astral-tokio-tar applies the PAX header\u0027s size extension to the next header in sequence, effectively desynchronizing the stream and enabling astral-tokio-tar specific skippage/extraction of members. In other words, a file can be contrived to extract differently on astral-tokio-tar than on other tar parsers.\n\n### Patches\n\nVersions 0.6.2 and newer of astral-tokio-tar address this differential.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers are advised to upgrade to version 0.6.1 or newer to address this advisory.\n\nThere is no workaround other than upgrading. Users should experience no breaking changes as a result of the upgrade.\n\n### Resources\n\n- GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx is a similar PAX desynchronization bug\n- GHSA-fp55-jw48-c537 is another similar PAX desynchronization bug",
  "id": "GHSA-3cv2-h65g-fgmm",
  "modified": "2026-05-29T19:08:23Z",
  "published": "2026-05-29T19:08:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/astral-sh/tokio-tar/security/advisories/GHSA-3cv2-h65g-fgmm"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/astral-sh/tokio-tar"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0145.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "astral-tokio-tar has a PAX Header Desynchronization issue"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…