GHSA-38C9-3PHJ-GG36

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-22 03:33 – Updated: 2026-10-22 03:33
VLAI
Details

Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a remote content blocking bypass. rcube_washtml inspected the SVG SMIL animation attributes to, from and values for URIs, but not by; so markup such as in an HTML message caused remote content to be loaded without the user's consent, disclosing the client IP address and confirming that the message was opened. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix remote-content blocker bypass via SVG SMIL by attribute”.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-114729"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-184"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-22T03:16:38Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a remote content blocking bypass. rcube_washtml inspected the SVG SMIL animation attributes `to`, `from` and values for URIs, but not `by`; so markup such as in an HTML message caused remote content to be loaded without the user\u0027s consent, disclosing the client IP address and confirming that the message was opened. Upstream fixed this in the commit \u201cFix remote-content blocker bypass via SVG SMIL `by` attribute\u201d.",
  "id": "GHSA-38c9-3phj-gg36",
  "modified": "2026-10-22T03:33:49Z",
  "published": "2026-10-22T03:33:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114729"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/2b6ff79d8b14f94b0ff04765b7f02dbfdfe98efa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/96d993b4ac57166a094b5774f4761e0b905d9a05"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/1151279"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.20"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.