GHSA-35MJ-PJQH-8J57

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:15 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:15
VLAI?
Details

The Cisco ATA 187 Analog Telephone Adaptor with firmware 9.2.1.0 and 9.2.3.1 before ES build 4 does not properly implement access control, which allows remote attackers to execute operating-system commands via vectors involving a session on TCP port 7870, aka Bug ID CSCtz67038.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-1111"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2013-02-13T23:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Cisco ATA 187 Analog Telephone Adaptor with firmware 9.2.1.0 and 9.2.3.1 before ES build 4 does not properly implement access control, which allows remote attackers to execute operating-system commands via vectors involving a session on TCP port 7870, aka Bug ID CSCtz67038.",
  "id": "GHSA-35mj-pjqh-8j57",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:15:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:15:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1111"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130206-ata187"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…