GHSA-35FC-6M3P-H4PM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:04 – Updated: 2022-05-02 00:04Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework with the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous client input, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by a query string containing a "<~/" (less-than tilde slash) sequence followed by a crafted STYLE element.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-3843"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-08-27T20:41:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework with the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous client input, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by a query string containing a \"\u003c~/\" (less-than tilde slash) sequence followed by a crafted STYLE element.",
"id": "GHSA-35fc-6m3p-h4pm",
"modified": "2022-05-02T00:04:14Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:04:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3843"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44743"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4193"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.procheckup.com/PDFs/bypassing-dot-NET-ValidateRequest.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.procheckup.com/Vulnerability_PR08-20.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/495667/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/496071/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.