GHSA-34XG-WGJX-8XPH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-11 13:04 – Updated: 2026-07-15 21:58Impact
guzzlehttp/psr7 improperly interpreted malformed Host header values when constructing request URIs from inbound request data. This issue concerns inbound request parsing and server request construction. It does not require serializing a PSR-7 request, and it is not part of the normal outbound request-sending path used by guzzlehttp/guzzle.
A vulnerable flow is:
- An attacker controls a raw HTTP request or server variable containing a
Hostvalue. - The
Hostvalue contains URI authority delimiters, such astrusted.example@evil.example. guzzlehttp/psr7uses that value to construct a URI.- The URI parser treats the portion before
@as userinfo and the portion after@as the URI host. - The resulting PSR-7 request URI host differs from the original
Hostheader value.
For example, Host: trusted.example@evil.example can result in a PSR-7 URI whose host is evil.example, while the original Host header value remains trusted.example@evil.example.
Applications are affected if they parse attacker-controlled raw HTTP requests with GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Message::parseRequest() or the legacy 1.x GuzzleHttp\Psr7\parse_request() function, or if they build server requests from attacker-controlled server variables with GuzzleHttp\Psr7\ServerRequest::fromGlobals() or GuzzleHttp\Psr7\ServerRequest::getUriFromGlobals(), and then rely on the resulting URI host for routing, allow-list checks, credential selection, or forwarding decisions. Applications using guzzlehttp/psr7 only through Guzzle's standard HTTP client APIs are not expected to be affected. In affected forwarding or gateway scenarios, this may cause requests or credentials to be sent to an unintended host.
Patches
The issue is patched in 2.10.2 and later. 1.x is end-of-life and will not receive a patch.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade immediately, validate Host values before passing untrusted request data to Message::parseRequest(), legacy 1.x parse_request(), ServerRequest::fromGlobals(), or ServerRequest::getUriFromGlobals().
Accept only uri-host [ ":" port ]. Reject values containing whitespace, control characters, userinfo (@), path (/ or \), query (?), fragment (#), malformed IP literals or bracket syntax, or invalid port syntax.
Do not validate Host by prefixing it with http:// and passing it to parse_url(), because that can reinterpret malformed values as URI userinfo and host.
References
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.3
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-4.2.4
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-7.2
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "guzzlehttp/psr7"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.10.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-48998"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-11T13:04:53Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-11T13:16:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Impact\n\n`guzzlehttp/psr7` improperly interpreted malformed `Host` header values when constructing request URIs from inbound request data. This issue concerns inbound request parsing and server request construction. It does not require serializing a PSR-7 request, and it is not part of the normal outbound request-sending path used by `guzzlehttp/guzzle`.\n\nA vulnerable flow is:\n\n1. An attacker controls a raw HTTP request or server variable containing a `Host` value.\n2. The `Host` value contains URI authority delimiters, such as `trusted.example@evil.example`.\n3. `guzzlehttp/psr7` uses that value to construct a URI.\n4. The URI parser treats the portion before `@` as userinfo and the portion after `@` as the URI host.\n5. The resulting PSR-7 request URI host differs from the original `Host` header value.\n\nFor example, `Host: trusted.example@evil.example` can result in a PSR-7 URI whose host is `evil.example`, while the original Host header value remains `trusted.example@evil.example`.\n\nApplications are affected if they parse attacker-controlled raw HTTP requests with `GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\Message::parseRequest()` or the legacy 1.x `GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\parse_request()` function, or if they build server requests from attacker-controlled server variables with `GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\ServerRequest::fromGlobals()` or `GuzzleHttp\\Psr7\\ServerRequest::getUriFromGlobals()`, and then rely on the resulting URI host for routing, allow-list checks, credential selection, or forwarding decisions. Applications using `guzzlehttp/psr7` only through Guzzle\u0027s standard HTTP client APIs are not expected to be affected. In affected forwarding or gateway scenarios, this may cause requests or credentials to be sent to an unintended host.\n\n## Patches\n\nThe issue is patched in `2.10.2` and later. `1.x` is end-of-life and will not receive a patch.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nIf you cannot upgrade immediately, validate Host values before passing untrusted request data to `Message::parseRequest()`, legacy 1.x `parse_request()`, `ServerRequest::fromGlobals()`, or `ServerRequest::getUriFromGlobals()`.\n\nAccept only `uri-host [ \":\" port ]`. Reject values containing whitespace, control characters, userinfo (`@`), path (`/` or `\\`), query (`?`), fragment (`#`), malformed IP literals or bracket syntax, or invalid port syntax.\n\nDo not validate Host by prefixing it with `http://` and passing it to `parse_url()`, because that can reinterpret malformed values as URI userinfo and host.\n\n## References\n\n* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.2\n* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#section-3.3\n* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-4.2.4\n* https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#section-7.2",
"id": "GHSA-34xg-wgjx-8xph",
"modified": "2026-07-15T21:58:09Z",
"published": "2026-06-11T13:04:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/guzzle/psr7/security/advisories/GHSA-34xg-wgjx-8xph"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48998"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/guzzlehttp/psr7/CVE-2026-48998.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/guzzle/psr7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "guzzlehttp/psr7 has Host Confusion via Authority Reinterpretation"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.