Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-34Q7-82VG-CV73

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-23 15:31

Details

A hostname canonicalization vulnerability in the email HTML sanitizers of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an unauthenticated sender to bypass the restriction on forms that target the Zimbra host. DefangFilter and the OWASP ActionAttributePolicy compare the form-action hostname with the request hostname before browser URL canonicalization. A percent-encoded hostname can therefore survive sanitization while the browser submits the form to the normal Zimbra origin with the recipient's authentication cookie. This permits authenticated form requests from a crafted email after the recipient opens it in Classic and submits the form. The issue is present in ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.21. It does not bypass an endpoint's CSRF-token checks; a state-changing attack additionally requires an endpoint that accepts the resulting request without that protection.

Severity

4.3 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-93630"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-180"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T14:17:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A hostname canonicalization vulnerability in the email HTML sanitizers of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an unauthenticated sender to bypass the restriction on forms that target the Zimbra host. DefangFilter and the OWASP ActionAttributePolicy compare the form-action hostname with the request hostname before browser URL canonicalization. A percent-encoded hostname can therefore survive sanitization while the browser submits the form to the normal Zimbra origin with the recipient\u0027s authentication cookie. This permits authenticated form requests from a crafted email after the recipient opens it in Classic and submits the form. The issue is present in ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.21. It does not bypass an endpoint\u0027s CSRF-token checks; a state-changing attack additionally requires an endpoint that accepts the resulting request without that protection.",
  "id": "GHSA-34q7-82vg-cv73",
  "modified": "2026-10-23T15:31:38Z",
  "published": "2026-10-23T15:31:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93630"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ve-breaking-zimbra-identity-boundaries-part-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2026-93630 (GCVE-0-2026-93630)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-23 13:21 – Updated: 2026-10-23 13:21

Title

Zimbra Collaboration Suite Email HTML Sanitizer Bypass via Hostname Canonicalization

Summary

Severity

4.3 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

CWE

CWE-180 - Incorrect behavior order: validate before canonicalize

Assigner

rapid7 CNA under the mitre root

CNA scorecard B 76/100 over 81 records in the last 180 days details

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories	vendor-advisory
https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ve-breaking-zimb…	related

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
Zimbra	Zimbra Collaboration Suite	Affected: 0 , < 10.1.21 (semver)

Date Public

2026-10-23 12:49

Credits

Jonah Burgess (CryptoCat), Senior Security Researcher, Rapid7

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite",
          "vendor": "Zimbra",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "10.1.21",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jonah Burgess (CryptoCat), Senior Security Researcher, Rapid7"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-10-23T12:49:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "A hostname canonicalization vulnerability in the email HTML sanitizers of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an unauthenticated sender to bypass the restriction on forms that target the Zimbra host. DefangFilter and the OWASP ActionAttributePolicy compare the form-action hostname with the request hostname before browser URL canonicalization. A percent-encoded hostname can therefore survive sanitization while the browser submits the form to the normal Zimbra origin with the recipient\u0027s authentication cookie. This permits authenticated form requests from a crafted email after the recipient opens it in Classic and submits the form. The issue is present in ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.21. It does not bypass an endpoint\u0027s CSRF-token checks; a state-changing attack additionally requires an endpoint that accepts the resulting request without that protection."
            }
          ],
          "value": "A hostname canonicalization vulnerability in the email HTML sanitizers of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) allows an unauthenticated sender to bypass the restriction on forms that target the Zimbra host. DefangFilter and the OWASP ActionAttributePolicy compare the form-action hostname with the request hostname before browser URL canonicalization. A percent-encoded hostname can therefore survive sanitization while the browser submits the form to the normal Zimbra origin with the recipient\u0027s authentication cookie. This permits authenticated form requests from a crafted email after the recipient opens it in Classic and submits the form. The issue is present in ZCS 10.1.16 and 10.1.21. It does not bypass an endpoint\u0027s CSRF-token checks; a state-changing attack additionally requires an endpoint that accepts the resulting request without that protection."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "No individual metric - Chain only with separately reported CalDAV CSRF"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-180",
              "description": "CWE-180 Incorrect behavior order: validate before canonicalize",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-23T13:21:39.551Z",
        "orgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
        "shortName": "rapid7"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "related"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ve-breaking-zimbra-identity-boundaries-part-1/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Zimbra Collaboration Suite Email HTML Sanitizer Bypass via Hostname Canonicalization",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9974b330-7714-4307-a722-5648477acda7",
    "assignerShortName": "rapid7",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-93630",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-23T13:21:39.551Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-18T12:22:34.911Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-23T13:21:39.551Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

Order JSON

Publication & reservation Sightings KEV catalogs Other timestamps

Loading timeline…

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted