GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-345M-8Q8P-CX77

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Clear rb node linkage when freeing bpf_rb_root

bpf_rb_root_free() detaches the root by copying the current rb_root_cached and then replacing the live root with RB_ROOT_CACHED. It then walks the copied root and drops each object contained in the tree.

This leaves the rb node state intact while dropping the object. If the object is refcounted and survives the drop, its bpf_rb_node_kern still contains an owner pointer to the freed root and stale rb tree linkage. If a later bpf_rb_root allocation reuses the same address, bpf_rbtree_remove() can incorrectly pass the owner check and call rb_erase_cached() on a node whose rb pointers belong to the old tree.

Mirror the list draining behavior by marking nodes as busy while the root is being detached, then clear the rb node and release the owner before dropping the containing object. This makes surviving nodes unowned and safe to reject from remove or accept for a later add.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74344"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:35Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Clear rb node linkage when freeing bpf_rb_root\n\nbpf_rb_root_free() detaches the root by copying the current rb_root_cached\nand then replacing the live root with RB_ROOT_CACHED. It then walks the\ncopied root and drops each object contained in the tree.\n\nThis leaves the rb node state intact while dropping the object. If the\nobject is refcounted and survives the drop, its bpf_rb_node_kern still\ncontains an owner pointer to the freed root and stale rb tree linkage. If\na later bpf_rb_root allocation reuses the same address, bpf_rbtree_remove()\ncan incorrectly pass the owner check and call rb_erase_cached() on a node\nwhose rb pointers belong to the old tree.\n\nMirror the list draining behavior by marking nodes as busy while the root\nis being detached, then clear the rb node and release the owner before\ndropping the containing object. This makes surviving nodes unowned and\nsafe to reject from remove or accept for a later add.",
  "id": "GHSA-345m-8q8p-cx77",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:40Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74344"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2eb39de4962f842d653e96818ae372665cd481fd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a7910ee060d8ce55612f5b3cc267f3a265a3cec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/574612793bed416f6c05fe7c9b50e9eb0441997e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…