GHSA-33GX-2JCQ-HQ54
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:45 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:45
VLAI
Details
phpMyFAQ 2.6.11 and 2.6.12, as distributed between December 4th and December 15th 2010, contains an externally introduced modification (Trojan Horse) in the getTopTen method in inc/Faq.php, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-4558"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-12-17T19:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "phpMyFAQ 2.6.11 and 2.6.12, as distributed between December 4th and December 15th 2010, contains an externally introduced modification (Trojan Horse) in the getTopTen method in inc/Faq.php, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code.",
"id": "GHSA-33gx-2jcq-hq54",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:45:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:45:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-4558"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42622"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.phpmyfaq.de/advisory_2010-12-15.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45442"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3254"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…