GHSA-2XJR-G6RH-FXQF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:06 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:06
VLAI
Details

Buffer overflow in invscout in IBM AIX 5.1.0 through 5.3.0 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long command line argument.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-2232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-07-12T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in invscout in IBM AIX 5.1.0 through 5.3.0 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long command line argument.",
  "id": "GHSA-2xjr-g6rh-fxqf",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:06:09Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:06:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014132"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.caughq.org/advisories/CAU-2005-0002.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/advisories/8816"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13909"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…