GHSA-2V8P-3F2J-5MP7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-06 19:49 – Updated: 2026-08-06 19:49Impact
Mermaid XY Charts are vulnerable to an infinite loop DoS attack in the setXAxisRangeData(), when configuring an X-Axis with invalid parameters.
As each loop appends an element to an array, this would generally only cause an RangeError: Invalid array length to appear after a few seconds, but may cause the page/JavaScript process to crash due to memory exhaustion, depending on the environment.
Proof-of-concept
xychart
x-axis 1 --> 1
line [1, 2]
Patches
This has been patched in https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/630aa7e5dd417e1f56bff2a1ce8df2c5ad08d289 and released in Mermaid v11.16.1.
A backport has been made for the v10 branch in ef60adc837d9d5107af21285f01e83dea309bd0a and was released in Mermaid v10.9.8
Workarounds
There are no known workarounds. Please update to the latest version or apply the patch.
References
- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/630aa7e5dd417e1f56bff2a1ce8df2c5ad08d289
- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/mermaid%4011.16.1
- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/ef60adc837d9d5107af21285f01e83dea309bd0a
- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/v10.9.8
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "mermaid"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "10.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "10.9.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "mermaid"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "11.0.0-alpha.1"
},
{
"fixed": "11.16.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-71436"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1325",
"CWE-835"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-06T19:49:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nMermaid XY Charts are vulnerable to an infinite loop DoS attack in the `setXAxisRangeData()`, when configuring an X-Axis with invalid parameters.\n\nAs each loop appends an element to an array, this would generally only cause an `RangeError: Invalid array length` to appear after a few seconds, but may cause the page/JavaScript process to crash due to memory exhaustion, depending on the environment.\n\n#### Proof-of-concept\n\n```txt\nxychart\n x-axis 1 --\u003e 1\n line [1, 2]\n```\n\n### Patches\n\nThis has been patched in https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/630aa7e5dd417e1f56bff2a1ce8df2c5ad08d289 and released in [Mermaid v11.16.1](https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/mermaid%4011.16.1).\n\nA backport has been made for the v10 branch in ef60adc837d9d5107af21285f01e83dea309bd0a and was released in [Mermaid v10.9.8](https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/v10.9.8)\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no known workarounds. Please update to the latest version or apply the patch.\n\n### References\n\n- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/630aa7e5dd417e1f56bff2a1ce8df2c5ad08d289\n- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/mermaid%4011.16.1\n- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/ef60adc837d9d5107af21285f01e83dea309bd0a\n- https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/v10.9.8",
"id": "GHSA-2v8p-3f2j-5mp7",
"modified": "2026-08-06T19:49:48Z",
"published": "2026-08-06T19:49:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/security/advisories/GHSA-2v8p-3f2j-5mp7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/pull/8022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/630aa7e5dd417e1f56bff2a1ce8df2c5ad08d289"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/commit/ef60adc837d9d5107af21285f01e83dea309bd0a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/mermaid@11.16.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid/releases/tag/v10.9.8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Mermaid XY Charts are vulnerable to an infinite loop DoS"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.