GHSA-2P59-XC6P-6W7C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ALSA: PCM: Fix wait queue list corruption in snd_pcm_drain() on linked streams

snd_pcm_drain() uses init_waitqueue_entry which does not clear entry.prev/next, and add_wait_queue with a conditional remove_wait_queue that is skipped when to_check is no longer in the group after concurrent UNLINK. The orphaned wait entry remains on the unlinked substream sleep queue. On the next drain iteration, add_wait_queue adds the entry to a new queue while still linked on the old one, corrupting both lists. A subsequent wake_up dereferences NULL at the func pointer (mapped from the spinlock at offset 0 of the misinterpreted wait_queue_head_t), causing a kernel panic.

Replace init_waitqueue_entry/add_wait_queue/conditional remove_wait_queue with init_wait_entry/prepare_to_wait/ finish_wait. init_wait_entry clears prev/next via INIT_LIST_HEAD on each iteration and sets autoremove_wake_function which auto-removes the entry on wake-up. finish_wait safely handles both the already-removed and still-queued cases.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53242"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nALSA: PCM: Fix wait queue list corruption in snd_pcm_drain() on linked streams\n\nsnd_pcm_drain() uses init_waitqueue_entry which does not clear\nentry.prev/next, and add_wait_queue with a conditional\nremove_wait_queue that is skipped when to_check is no longer\nin the group after concurrent UNLINK.  The orphaned wait entry\nremains on the unlinked substream sleep queue.  On the next\ndrain iteration, add_wait_queue adds the entry to a new queue\nwhile still linked on the old one, corrupting both lists.  A\nsubsequent wake_up dereferences NULL at the func pointer\n(mapped from the spinlock at offset 0 of the misinterpreted\nwait_queue_head_t), causing a kernel panic.\n\nReplace init_waitqueue_entry/add_wait_queue/conditional\nremove_wait_queue with init_wait_entry/prepare_to_wait/\nfinish_wait.  init_wait_entry clears prev/next via\nINIT_LIST_HEAD on each iteration and sets\nautoremove_wake_function which auto-removes the entry on\nwake-up.  finish_wait safely handles both the already-removed\nand still-queued cases.",
  "id": "GHSA-2p59-xc6p-6w7c",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:46Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53242"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c71a9522555ff137a9ca36b15d759ca04d84788"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88fe2e3658726cb21ff2dcf9770bf672f9b9d31b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b053fcd8912f06c30f932f5b8ec41c72de474695"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cac5bf3500ee6422cf64e0df0b5daeecfed42917"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd98837db15f323463b8df07282ac723bd5c3fed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d68b621bb5a48051932f1017a6e1bc9b18f854d0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d842f26a167e77a36f3ed333b9fa99d36ef99fe6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…